Coalition Opposes Partial Shutdown of Federal Government

The Coalition for American Heritage opposes President Trump’s decision to trigger a partial government shutdown. Closing federal agencies threatens America’s historic legacy, which our members work to preserve. We value the contributions of dedicated federal employees who process National Register nominations, administer grants to state and tribal historic preservation offices, and assist communities to save historic resources after natural disasters strike. We appreciate the work they do to highlight and preserve America’s historic treasures. Keeping them on the job is critical to preserving the rich and varied history of our nation.

We recognize that the President is attempting to secure funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and the Coalition for American Heritage reiterates its objection to the Administration’s plans. The Coalition for American Heritage opposes the Administration’s decision to waive laws, including the National Historic Preservation Act, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act, in order to speed construction of a border wall. Waiver of these laws poses a critical danger to the rich, irreplaceable cultural heritage of the border region. We urge the federal government to abide by existing processes to ensure that federal agencies weigh the effects their actions will have on cultural resources.

Help Empower Our Advocacy!

We have an exciting new initiative that needs your help and expertise! Our work advocating on Capitol Hill for historic preservation has been very effective over the last two years. However, historic preservation advocacy is stymied because often we don’t have organized data with which to educate lawmakers about our causes. Legislators want to know about the impact of these heritage issues on their districts, particularly in terms of money and jobs. For that reason, the Coalition is designing the nation’s first heritage advocacy database.

This fall, the Coalition hired a Data Coordinator to help design and build the database. Our first version will combine data on historic preservation funding, public heritage visits, employment in related fields, tourism, the impact of Section 106, and other topics near and dear to our hearts. Data Coordinator Kate Ellenberger has a PhD from Binghamton University (SUNY) in anthropological archaeology and specializes in using digital tools for community archaeology and public outreach.

Coalition staff will use this database to counsel Coalition members and stakeholders on how to communicate most effectively with government officials about our critical heritage causes. We know that our colleagues have an immense volume of data and experience articulating the value of heritage work in their communities, and we are confident that building this database will make it possible to share those important insights with the government officials whose actions directly impact historic preservation regulations.

You can see a summary of the database in its early state here:

How You Can Help:

Now that we are close to having a functioning first draft of the database structure, we are looking for information and source recommendations from Coalition members to ensure that we can incorporate these in the system we’ve created. If you would like to help us access existing data we would love to hear from you! At this early stage, we are particularly interested in:

  • Summary data on the number of archaeological sites and archaeological project reviews by state or other municipality
  • Data on the economic impact of historic preservation
  • Data on the economic impact of heritage work or archaeological labor
  • Examples of federal research or preservation funding that made a direct impact in a community
  • Comprehensive lists of public archaeology projects, especially if visitor counts are available
  • Data on the public response to outreach efforts or historic resources

Data is most useful for us when it includes Congressional districts or zip codes (which can be used to estimate Congressional district) and, ideally we can use to gather more supporting information.

If you are willing to share your expertise to help us with this project, please email questions, resources, and information to kate@culturalheritagepartners.com.

Coalition Supports Curation Program at USACE

The Coalition for American Heritage expressed its enthusiastic support for recertification of the Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections (MCX-CMAC) at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).

MCX-CMAC curates and manages the curation of USACE collected materials. They also provide returning veterans with essential work experience and jobs kills through their Veteran’s Curation Program (VCP). By training veterans in curation management, the VCP helps veterans re-enter the civilian job market.

Read our letter of support here.

Get the Latest News on Preservation Policy in D.C.

Read our Update from Washington for details on the Coalition for American Heritage’s opposition to a monument management plan at Bears Ears. See the listing of preservation-related jobs in D.C. Find out how we are encouraging the Department of the Interior to expand historic leasing programs. And, learn how the diverse group of new Members of Congress may impact preservation policy.

Click here to read the December update.

Coalition Supports Historic Leasing at National Parks

The Coalition for American Heritage joined 97 other preservation leaders in a letter to Congress supporting the expanded use of historic leases in America’s national parks.

Historic leasing programs help maintain historic buildings and bring them back to life. These public-private partnerships are a crucial tool that allows the national park to maintain ownership of the building while making the lessee responsible for the preservation and maintenance needs of the structure.

To read the full letter, click here.

Coalition Opposes New Management Plan for Scaled Back Bears Ears National Monument Sites

In a letter to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Coalition for American Heritage expressed confidence that the courts will overturn Presidential Proclamation 9681 and restore Bears Ears National Monument to its full size. The Coalition urged BLM to adopt a “no action” policy toward Monument Management Plans and Environmental Impact Statements for Indian Creek and Shash Jaa National Monuments, the two smaller monuments that President Trump wants to create in place of Bears Ears National Monument.

Bears Ears National Monument, whose creation the Coalition for American Heritage strongly supported, encompassed a landscape of great importance to both the scientific knowledge and cultural heritage of the United States. The Bears Ears landscape is believed to contain more than 100,000 archaeological sites. Proclamation 9681 puts most of those irreplaceable sites, along with numerous cultural resources and tribal sacred places, at far greater risk.

Click here to read a full copy of our letter to BLM.

Impact of the 2018 Midterm Elections: New Diversity Creates New Opportunities

Earlier this month, the American electorate turned out in record numbers and flipped the U.S. House of Representatives to Democratic control, electing the most diverse set of new members in our history. This change could have major repercussions for historic preservation policy.

More than 100 women will serve in the House of Representatives and 23 will serve in the Senate. This represents the most women serving in Congress in history. The first two Native American women and the first two Muslim women were elected to the House. The number of African-American members will reach a high of 55 and the number of Latino members will be 43. Also, 10 openly LGBT members will serve in the next Congress. This degree of diversity will have a direct impact on how Congress addresses cultural resources policies.

With the growth of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), issues affecting the African-American community will likely receive more attention. Specific programs, such as preservation efforts at Historically Black Colleges and Universities, will likely get more support. Legislation that highlights the African-American experience, like bills creating a network of sites related to the Underground Railroad, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Reconstruction Era, are also more apt to gain traction in Congress.

Several CBC members are poised to chair committees, including Rep. Eddie Bernice Jones, who will lead the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. She has already pledged to address climate change in her committee and as part of a joint effort with the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Natural Resources. With Congressional leaders willing to discuss the impacts of climate change, there will be opportunities to highlight how rising sea levels threaten archaeological resources.

The election of two Native American women to the U.S. House will bring increased attention to tribal matters. Also, the Democratic victory means that Rep. Raul Grijalva will chair the House Natural Resources Committee. Rep. Grijalva’s district includes 7 tribes, and he is vocal in his support for tribal sovereignty and government-to-government relationships. Rep. Grijalva sponsored the RESPECT Act, a bill which would mandate that federal agencies consult with tribes before taking a variety of major actions. The bill would codify a Clinton-era executive order that has never had the force of law.

Individual members will also draw from personal experience to highlight the importance of diversity in policy-making. For example, Senator Tammy Duckworth (an Asian-American woman, combat veteran, and double amputee) just published an editorial in The State Journal-Register arguing for national parks to recognize the histories of diverse peoples and cultures. She also advocated for making the national parks more accessible to all people.

When the new Congress convenes in January, they will begin to craft legislation and use committee hearings to highlight the issues that matter to them. This represents a new opportunity for the historic preservation community to work with a more diverse group of members to help preserve and share the American story — including the voices of traditionally underrepresented communities.

For updates on how the Coalition for American Heritage is working with Congress to promote heritage preservation, sign up as an individual member.

Coalition Opposes Waiver of Laws to Speed Border Fence Construction

The Coalition wrote to the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol to oppose the waiver of laws, like the National Historic Preservation Act, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and the National Environmental Protection Act, in order to speed construction of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas.

Waiver of these laws poses a critical danger to the rich, irreplaceable archaeological heritage of the border region. The Coalition both urges the federal government to abide by existing processes to ensure that federal agencies weigh the effects their actions will have on archaeological resources.

Read the Coalition’s letter here.

 

 

Read the Latest Update from Washington, DC!

Get the details on the Coalition for American Heritage’s effort to safeguard cultural resources on U.S. Forest Service lands. Find out what Congressional candidates across America think about the most controversial issues in preservation today. Read our October newsletter!

Candidate Spotlight: Congressman Paul Tonko of New York

Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!

Congressman Paul Tonko is running for reelection in Albany, New York!

Paul says that the national endowment monies “enrich the district both culturally and historically, and provide huge economic returns as well.” He says, “These resources help to develop our sense of place, our knowledge and appreciation of local history and art and allow us to be a travel destination for people all over the country and world.”

To learn more about Paul’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:

  1. What is your name?

Paul Tonko

  1. In which Congressional district are you running for election?

NY-20

  1. Is there a historically significant place that is important to you in your Congressional district?

There are too many places to name them all, but one that comes to mind is Guy Park Manor in my hometown of Amsterdam, New York. Guy Park Manor is the oldest building in Amsterdam and has a long and storied history. I had the honor of having my district office in the building when I was in the New York State Assembly. Unfortunately it suffered from extreme damages from flooding following Irene and is in need of restoration.

  1. What do you think of current proposals in Congress to require Congressional approval of the President’s decision to designate national monuments?

I oppose such proposals because this will result in less preservation and hurt the long history of presidential efforts to expand preservation.

  1. The National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to consider the effects of federal undertakings on historic properties before approving a project. Federal undertakings include: projects that need a federal permit, receive federal funds, or are located on federal land. How do you think this law impacts our communities and development timelines?

While some review is necessary to ensure that funding is being used efficiently and benefiting communities, these needs should be balanced with trying to have an expeditious process.

  1. Have you had the opportunity to meet with the State Historic Preservation Officer and/or State Archaeologist? Have you met with any local preservation groups?

Yes, I have met with the State Historic Preservation Officer and the State Historian. I have met with many local preservation groups including Schenectady County Historical Society, both of our national heritage areas, Historic Albany Foundation, the Mohawk Hudson Industrial Gateway, the Guy Park Manor Restoration group.

  1. How do think that federal funding of the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the National Science Foundation impacts our district?

These sources of federal funding are incredibly important. They enrich the district both culturally and historically, and provide huge economic returns as well. These resources help to develop our sense of place, our knowledge and appreciation of local history and art and allow us to be a travel destination for people all over the country and world. These are precarious times for federal funding and for government in general. We know too well that the national historical and landmark programs operate on very small budgets. These programs offer smart investing with a great return for local economies.

 Note: Paul’s opponent, Francis Vitollo, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.