The Coalition for American Heritage recently wrote to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) with suggestions for how it could improve the way it certifies new interstate natural gas facilities.
For details on how we propose to improve the process, read our letter to FERC.
Together with Preservation Utah, the Coalition for American Heritage wrote to Senators Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee in support of their bill, S. 2831, to establish the Golden Spike National Historic Park in Utah. If passed, the bill will also create a network of sites related to the completion of America’s first transcontinental railroad. A copy of our letter is available here.
Read our latest Update from Washington to learn why it’s important to call your Senators TODAY! Find out how you can join the Coalition for American Heritage in supporting investments in historic preservation.
This week will be pivotal in determining funding for State and Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, Save America’s Treasures, preservation of sites in the Civil Rights Network, funding for the National Endowments, and more. Together, let’s show our support for these vital programs.
Get details on how you can help here.
Congressman Grothman tried to reduce funding for the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities by 15%. Thankfully, his amendment failed by a vote of 114 – 297.
Let’s thank the 297 members of the U.S. House of Representatives who supported the endowments. Call (202-224-3121 switchboard) or email your Representative’s office today and say, “Thanks for voting against the Grothman amendment. I appreciate your support for America’s national endowments.”
To identify your Member of Congress, click here.
Look for your Representative’s name in the list below; these are all the members who voted against cuts to the endowments. (According to House tradition, Democrats are listed in italics and Republicans are not.)
| Adams Aderholt Aguilar Amodei Bacon Barletta Barragán Barton Beatty Bera Bergman Beyer Bilirakis Bishop (GA) Blum Blumenauer Blunt Rochester Bonamici Bost Boyle, Brendan F. Brady (PA) Brooks (IN) Brown (MD) Brownley (CA) Buchanan Bucshon Bustos Butterfield Calvert Capuano Carbajal Carson (IN) Carter (TX) Cartwright Castor (FL) Castro (TX) Cheney Chu, Judy Cicilline Clark (MA) Clarke (NY) Clay Cleaver Clyburn Coffman Cohen Cole Collins (GA) Collins (NY) Comstock Conaway Connolly Cook Cooper Correa Costa Costello (PA) Courtney Cramer Crawford Crist Crowley Cuellar Culberson Cummings Curbelo (FL) Davis (CA) Davis, Danny Davis, Rodney DeFazio DeGette Delaney DeLauro DelBene Demings Denham DeSaulnier Deutch Diaz-Balart Dingell Doggett Donovan Doyle, Michael F. Duffy Ellison Engel Eshoo Espaillat Esty (CT) Evans Faso Fitzpatrick Fleischmann Fortenberry Foster Frankel (FL) Frelinghuysen Fudge Gabbard |
Gallego Garamendi Gianforte Gohmert Gomez Gottheimer Gowdy Granger Green, Al Green, Gene Grijalva Gutiérrez Handel Harper Hastings Heck Herrera Beutler Higgins (NY) Hill Himes Hollingsworth Hoyer Huffman Hultgren Hurd Jackson Lee Jayapal Jeffries Jenkins (WV) Johnson (GA) Johnson (OH) Johnson, E. B. Joyce (OH) Kaptur Katko Keating Kelly (IL) Kelly (PA) Kennedy Khanna Kihuen Kildee Kilmer Kind King (NY) Kinzinger Knight Krishnamoorthi Kuster (NH) LaHood Lamb Lance Langevin Larsen (WA) Larson (CT) Lawrence Lawson (FL) Lee Levin Lewis (GA) Lieu, Ted Lipinski LoBiondo Loebsack Lofgren Long Love Lowenthal Lowey Lucas Lujan Grisham, M. Luján, Ben Ray Lynch MacArthur Maloney, Carolyn B. Maloney, Sean Marino Marshall Mast Matsui McCaul McCollum McEachin McGovern McKinley McNerney Meeks Meng Mitchell Moolenaar Moore Moulton Murphy (FL) Nadler Napolitano Neal Newhouse Nolan Norcross |
O’Halleran O’Rourke Olson Palazzo Pallone Panetta Pascrell Paulsen Payne Pearce Pelosi Perlmutter Peters Pingree Pocan Poe (TX) Poliquin Polis Price (NC) Quigley Raskin Ratcliffe Reed Reichert Renacci Rice (NY) Rogers (KY) Ros-Lehtinen Rosen Roskam Ross Roybal-Allard Ruiz Ruppersberger Rush Rutherford Ryan (OH) Sánchez Sarbanes Schakowsky Schiff Schneider Schrader Scott (VA) Scott, David Serrano Sessions Sewell (AL) Shea-Porter Sherman Shimkus Simpson Sinema Sires Smith (NJ) Smith (TX) Smith (WA) Soto Stefanik Stewart Stivers Suozzi Swalwell (CA) Takano Taylor Tenney Thompson (CA) Thompson (MS) Thompson (PA) Thornberry Tipton Titus Tonko Torres Trott Tsongas Turner Upton Valadao Vargas Veasey Vela Velázquez Visclosky Walden Walorski Wasserman Schultz Waters, Maxine Watson Coleman Weber (TX) Welch Williams Wilson (FL) Womack Yarmuth Yoder Young (AK) Young (IA) Zeldin |
Last night, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to increase funding for preservation programs and defeated an effort to reduce funds for the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Thanks to all of you who have advocated on behalf of historic preservation; your voices make a difference!
Several key amendments to the fiscal year 2019 Interior appropriations bill passed. Rep. Joe Courtney [D-CT] successfully offered an amendment to increase the investment in the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) by $5 million to equal the amount allocated in last year’s budget.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus also succeeded in securing additional funds for sites associated with the African-American experience.
Rep. Glenn Grothman [R-WI] led an effort to decrease funding for NEH by 15%, almost $23 million. However, the House of Representatives voted decisively, 114-297, against cutting NEH monies. We are pleased to again see the strong support in Congress for the NEH, despite President Trump’s pledges to eliminate funding for the National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities.
Next week, the U.S. Senate will vote on its version of the appropriations bill for the Department of the Interior. It is likely that we’ll need to make more calls to our Senators to ensure that they too support strong funding for preservation programs. Stay tuned!
Once both chambers have voted, conferees from the House and Senate will work together to create a compromise bill. If the compromise bill passes that House and Senate, it will then go the President for his signature.
The Coalition for American Heritage joined other leading preservation organizations in support of the Chaco Cultural Heritage Area Protection Act (S 2907). The bill, sponsored by New Mexico Senators Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, would withdraw the lands around Chaco Canyon from further development by the federal government. Only minerals owned by the federal government are subject to withdrawal; the bill excludes minerals in the area that are owned by private, state, and Tribal entities.
The Coalition applauds Senators Udall and Heinrich for their efforts to protect a remarkable national treasure. Chaco Canyon, and its surrounding landscape, are a testament to the awe-inspiring achievements of the Chacoan people, who founded a culture that dominated the area for more than 400 years. Their ceremonial buildings, great houses, and road networks are a vital part of the history of the American southwest.
The Coalition for American Heritage and its four founding member organizations, American Cultural Resources Association, American Anthropological Association, Society for American Archaeology, and Society for Historical Archaeology signed the letter. Several Coalition member organizations also signed on, including: Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology, Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, Florida Public Archaeology Network, Heritage Ohio, Illinois Archaeological Survey, Pennsylvania Archaeological Council, Save Our Heritage Organisation, and Society for California Archaeology.
If your organization would like to join us in advocating for historic preservation, click here.
Click here to read a full copy of the letter.
Your preservation group, including non-profit 501c3s, can create a survey to find out where candidates stand on historic preservation issues. The Coalition for American Heritage has step-by-step instructions on our new web page. Review the survey we are sending to all Congressional candidates. Watch a video for additional details. Get tips on researching your Member of Congress’s positions on preservation issues. Together, we can demonstrate that voters care about historic preservation!
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved legislation that would invest $88.91 million in the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) — $8 million less than last year. The drop in funding reflects cuts to the Save America’s Treasures program.
Last year, Congress invested $13 million in Save America’s Treasures, but the current budget would provide $5 million to preserve iconic Americana like the Star Spangled Banner that flew above Fort McHenry during the War of 1812; Thomas Edison’s laboratory; the poems carved by Chinese immigrants in the walls of Angel Island; Mesa Verde’s cliff dwellings; and Martin Luther King’s Ebenezer Baptist Church.
Together with many of our member organizations, the Coalition requested increased support for the Save America’s Treasures program in a letter to the Senate earlier this year. We noted that tax dollars do not fund the program; it receives revenue from Outer Continental Shelf Oil leases via the HPF. Furthermore, it requires dollar-for-dollar private matching funds. We will continue to advocate for an increased investment in Save America’s Treasures when the bill is considered by the full U.S. Senate.
Despite the drop in funding for Save America’s Treasures, this bill is positive for preservation in many other ways. The Senate Appropriations Committee maintained level funding for grants to states and tribes. They also continued to show support for several important programs that preserve the American story. Most critically, the bill is a significant improvement over President Trump’s request for a mere $32.672 million for the HPF.
These programs that would receive the same level of funding as they did in the FY18 omnibus bill:
These programs would receive increased investments:
The National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts would each receive $155 million if this bill passes – a $2.152 million increase over last year. Given President Trump’s previous efforts to eliminate these programs, this appropriations bill is a very positive signal of support for the important work that the endowments do.
The American Battlefield Protection Program grants would be funded at $15 million – a 50% increase.
The Coalition for American Heritage is very pleased to see the Senate Appropriations Committee recognize the importance of preserving our nation’s historic treasures. Investing in historic preservation is an investment in our communities – through heritage tourism, job promotion, and the preservation of America’s unique story.
Read our Update from Washington for details on how to choose preservation-friendly candidates, what the Coalition is doing to increase investments in preservation, and who the likely new Chair of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is.
Join the Coalition for American Heritage on Tuesday, June 19th at 1:00 p.m. ET for a 30-minute webinar “Research, Evaluate, Vote!”
We’ll discuss strategies for assessing a candidate’s track record on preservation. Plus, we’ll talk about pro-active steps that voters can use to get candidates’ views on the record. Working as a group, preservation organizations can also determine how candidates, if elected or reelected, will work to preserve America’s historic treasures.
Many heritage professionals conduct research and evaluations as part of their jobs. Let the Coalition for American Heritage demonstrate how to use those skills to find the most preservation-friendly political candidates.
Candidate Spotlight: Vangie Williams of Virginia
Vangie Williams, a strategic planner, is running for Congress in a Virginia district that includes the home of Richard and Mildred Loving, her relations, whose union spurred the Supreme Court to strike down all laws against interracial marriage.
Vangie’s experience working as a construction project manager led her to support streamlining of the federal permitting process. She strongly supports funding for the national endowments.
To learn more about Vangie’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Vangie Williams
First District of Virginia
The 1st District of Virginia is often referred to as the birthplace of American History. Within its borders are significant places like Ferry Farm (George Washington’s birthplace), Belle Grove (James Madison’s birthplace), Stratford Hall (Robert E. Lee’s birthplace), Chatham Manor, and many, many battlefields of both the Revolution and the Civil War (Cold Harbor, Fredericksburg). Throughout its gerrymandered history, the 1st has been the on-and-off home to Yorktown, Williamsburg and Jamestown. In fact, you cannot enter the Jamestown Settlement site without first passing through the 1st District (which ends at the estuary bridge to the settlement site itself). Just as significant, the 1st District was home to Richard and Mildred Loving (to whom I am related) who ultimately got the Supreme Court to strike down all laws against interracial marriage. Furthermore, Green v. New Kent County Board of Education ended the last vestiges of “separate but equal” interpretations of the law and a movement is growing to enshrine that decision in the old New Kent County High School facility as a museum for social integration and acceptance.
I think the President should have the right to designate national monuments without the approval of Congress. However, I do not think that the removal of national monument designation should be subject to the same lack of Congressional oversight. A President should not be able to remove a designation without congressional approval to ensure that the spirit of preservation is maintained and that no commercial motives are promoted.
As a former construction project manager I can tell you exactly what the impact of the federal permitting and funding process is: delays that lead to unnecessary carrying expenses which often lead to project cancellation. The federal project approval and permitting process needs to be streamlined to encourage more preservation – either as stand-alone projects or as part of development or redevelopment projects.
I have not met with the current State Preservation Officer in Virginia, but as an avid genealogist, I have met with many local preservation groups over the years and encourage preservation whenever possible.
Funding for the National Endowments is CRITICAL. The endowments do more than preserve and encourage new art or new discoveries, they continue the growth of our collective American identity and our unique and evolving soul. As a member of the House of Representatives, I will fight for full funding of our National Endowments.
Note: Vangie’s opponent, Rep. Rob Wittman, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Pete Wells of Virginia
Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!
Pete Wells is running for Congress in Richmond, VA.
Pete says that the Richmond and Hampton Roads area is full of historic sites, including St. John’s Episcopal Church, where Patrick Henry gave his “liberty or death” speech.
To learn more about Pete’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Pete Wells
Virginia 4th Congressional district
The entire district is full of significant historical places. If forced to choose, I would say St. John’s Episcopal Church where Patrick Henry gave his “liberty or death” speech.
I feel that this will turn national monuments into yet another political game for both sides to score points with radical portions of their base
This law slows development timelines. Giving the community time to properly debate and weigh the benefits of the project against the costs to historical sites. It gives us a chance to preserve and document as much as possible without sacrificing the future needs of the community.
I have not.
The district contains many locations that receive funding from these programs. Areas that directly benefit from this redistribution of wealth from districts that don’t have as many cultural sites are generally better off because of this.
Note: Pete’s opponents, Rep. Don McEachin and Ryan McAdams, also received surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Don Beyer of Virginia
Don Beyer is running for reelection in Alexandria, Virginia, a historic area with settlements dating back to the late 1600’s and home to the National Science Foundation.
Don says that the National Historic Preservation Act “improves communities by preserving the historic character of buildings and neighborhoods.”
To learn more about Don’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Don Beyer
VA-08
There are many. George Washington’s Mount Vernon is, of course, a remarkable and beautiful historic site. Gunston Hall, George Mason’s home, is also spectacular and important, though less well known. Arlington National Cemetery and the Iwo Jima Memorial are more recent historic sites in Virginia’s 8th. In addition, there are many lesser known historic sites and properties on the National Register of Historic places in Alexandria, which is not surprising given its settlements dating back to the late 1600s.
Anything that would require congressional involvement in the Antiquities Act would be a dilution of the Act’s intent and something I oppose.
The National Historic Preservation Act slows development timelines, of course, but in a reasonable way, and one that is ultimately good for the locality. This law improves communities by preserving the historic character of buildings and neighborhoods.
I have not met with the State Historic Preservation Officer or Archaeologist, but have met with many local preservation groups, including Mount Vernon, Arlington National Cemetery, Gunston Hall, those representing the Iwo Jima Memorial, the Northern Virginia Conservation Trust, and various museums.
Funding for these important federal organizations reaches many individuals and institutions in Virginia’s 8th congressional district (and so many other communities across the country). They are essential groups, and I have been proud and pleased to know and represent many employees of each (and to be home to the NSF).
Note: Don’s opponent, Thomas Oh, also received a survey. His response is available here.
Candidate Spotlight: Thomas Oh of Virginia
Thomas Oh is a project manager and a Captain in the U.S. Army Reserve. He’s running for Congress in Alexandria, Virginia.
Thomas supports the idea of allowing Congress to approve a President’s decision to designate national monuments and declares himself a “huge fan” of checks and balances.
To learn more about Thomas’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Thomas Oh
Virginia’s 8th Congressional District
Yes, this entire district is historic. We are right in the Washington D.C. Metro Area. We have George Washington’s Home, Old Town Alexandria, Arlington National Cemetery, and more.
I support the idea of allowing Congress to approve a President’s decision to designate national monuments. This always protects national monuments when a President may decide to get rid of monuments. One branch should not have too much power, and I am huge fan of Checks and Balances.
I would honestly say this totally depends on local communities. Some local communities such as Arlington does not want historic areas and want new modernized developments. Other areas such as Old Town Alexandria wants to preserve history. Overall, I believe in having common sense regulations. Too much regulations and bureaucratic red tape creates utter chaos where progress is minimal.
I attended a seminar at a local community meeting on the importance of preserving the few historic sites that are left in Arlington and I support it.
I think it provides great benefit to our district. I like to see more government spending towards education and science. History provides mankind invaluable teachings to mankind. Our district has two universities and one community college. There are a lot of educational opportunities and sites that tell our history.
Note: Thomas’s opponent, Rep. Don Beyer, also received a survey. His response is here.
Candidate Spotlight: Dr. Vanessa Enoch
Dr. Vanessa Enoch, a small business owner and college professor, is running for Congress in western Ohio.
Vanessa has experience meeting with a State Historic Preservation Officer to get approval for projects. She says, “I think it is important to consider the impact on historic properties prior to initiating projects.”
To learn more about Vanessa’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Dr. Vanessa Enoch
OH-8
There are many historic places that are important to me throughout the 8th Congressional district in Ohio. Some of the ones that I am most familiar with are in West Chester and Liberty Township, however there are several in Hamilton, OH and throughout the district that are also important to me.
I don’t like that idea. Each President will value various aspects of history. That is unfair to the millions of Americans who don’t agree with the President.
I believe that this would create a longer wait times to have a project approved. I think it is important to consider the impact on historic properties prior to initiating projects. My experience has been that the process has not been bad.
Yes, I have met with the State Historic Preservation Officer to discuss and get approval for projects.
I believe that without these funds it is very difficult to initiate some of these projects, because it would be cost prohibitive and would not create a profit margin that would be attractive enough to pursue as a private entity.
Note: Vanessa’s opponent, Rep. Warren Davidson, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Donald Norcross of New Jersey
Congressman Donald Norcross is running for reelection in Camden County, New Jersey.
Donald has worked to highlight and preserve historic sites in his district, like the grave of Peter J. McGuire, an American labor leader the father of Labor Day, and the home where Martin Luther King, Jr. lived when he was a theology student.
To learn more about Donald’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Donald Norcross
New Jersey’s 1st Congressional District
The First District is full of fascinating and historic locations but two immediately come to mind as particularly meaningful to me. The first is the grave of Peter J. McGuire, an American labor leader and the Father of Labor Day. Every year before Labor Day I go visit his grave and memorial in Pennsauken, NJ and that is why in 2017 I introduced the Peter J. McGuire Labor Day Landmark Act to preserve this site forever. In my time in Congress I have also helped highlight the significance of another historic site, a home where Martin Luther King, Jr. lived as a theology student. In 2016 I invited Rep. John Lewis to the location in Camden City and together we highlighted the importance of that time in Martin Luther King’s life. Since that time efforts have been underway to maintain that landmark and I have been proud to support those efforts.
National monuments are sites of profound historical and environmental importance but sometimes their designation has been met with protest or controversy. Presidents have rarely taken the action of designating new monuments lightly and I have concern that Congressional approval of new monuments could politicize the process, but I am open to hearing more about how we can make the best decisions possible.
While the delays to these federal projects certainly cost valuable time and money, the sites of historical interest they save are often invaluable. Sadly, New Jersey recently lost a Revolutionary War-era home to a roadway project despite efforts in the community to find alternatives to its destruction.
I have been in contact with our state Historic Preservation board in regards to the historic former residence of Martin Luther King Jr. in Camden City. I have met with the Camden County Historical Preservation Society to discuss this project and many others in the past.
Immensely. These programs are vital for fostering education and civic engagement and I make sure every appropriations season to advocate for their funding.
Note: Donald’s opponent, Paul Dilks, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: W. Scott Howard of Idaho
Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!
Scott Howard, who works in information security, is running for Congress in western Idaho.
Scott says that the National Historic Preservation Act slows development timelines, but also helps communities by providing additional consideration for places of historic significance.
To learn more about Scott’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Scott Howard
2. In which Congressional district are you running for election?
Idaho’s First Congressional
Not me personally.
I don’t see a problem including congress in the decision, much like Supreme Court Justices are nominated and confirmed.
It slows down development timelines, by adding additional bureaucracy. It helps the communities by providing additional consideration for local places of historical significance.
No.
I don’t have enough information to answer this.
Note: Scott’s opponents, Russ Fulcher and Cristina McNeil, also received surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland
Senator Ben Cardin is running for reelection to the U.S. Senate!
Ben is lead sponsor of a bill to enhance the historic preservation tax credit, and he has introduced several bills to preserve key sites in Maryland, like Thurgood Marshall’s elementary school and President Street Station.
To learn more about Ben’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Ben Cardin
Maryland/Statewide
Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in Baltimore City and the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. C&O Canal National Historical Park. Antietam National Battlefield. President Street Station, the oldest surviving urban railroad terminal in America, and P.S. 103, the elementary school where Thurgood Marshall first learned many of the lessons that would make him a legendary lawyer and American jurist.
Both Republican and Democratic presidents have used their authority to designate national monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1906. I oppose efforts to roll back this authority or withdraw lands from federal protection. I am a cosponsor of S. 2354, the ANTIQUITIES Act of 2018, which would protect and enhances national monuments by officially declaring Congress’ support for the 51 national monuments established by presidents in both parties between January 1996 and April 2017, reinforcing that existing law clearly states that presidential proclamations designating national monuments are valid and cannot be reduced or diminished, except by an act of Congress, further enhance protections for the presidentially designated national monuments by 1) requiring that they be surveyed, mapped and that management plans be completed in two years—in the same manner as congressionally designated national monuments—and 2) that they receive additional resources to ensure that they will continue to meet their full potential of providing unmatched economic, recreational, and cultural benefits to their states and to the nation.
I support the National Historic Preservation Act and I support a process that maximizes outreach to and the involvement of all potential stakeholders. Such a process may be time-consuming but in most instances, it’s better to do it right than to do it fast, especially when historic resources are affected. As we learned the hard way in 1964 with the demolition of the original Pennsylvania Station in New York City, once these resources are lost, they are lost forever.
My staff and I have met with historic preservation officers and preservation groups countless times. I am the lead Senate sponsor of legislation to extend and enhance the historic preservation tax credit (S. 425 in this Congress, with Senator Susan Collins of Maine as the lead Republican co-sponsor). I have also introduced legislation to preserve the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail (S. 1644), Thurgood Marshall’s public elementary school (S. 1645), and President Street Station (S. 1646) in the 115th Congress.
The National Endowment for the Humanities has awarded $3,885,110 to Maryland Humanities during the period from November 2012 through October 2017 (Fiscal Years 2013 through 2017). This helped fund 6,511 program activities and 103 re-grants which affected 418,433 direct participants. In addition, 4,310,073 additional people were reached through grant‐supported projects, television & radio broadcasts, digital engagement, and fairs & festivals. Maryland Humanities leverages federal support at a rate of nearly 3:1 from the State of Maryland, local governments, and the private sector through cash and in‐kind contributions of goods and services. More than 4.3 million Marylanders, in 23 counties and Baltimore City, participated in more than 6,600 Maryland Humanities events in the last 5 years, 99 percent of which are absolutely free. Of direct participants being directly served by in person engagement, 40 percent are Maryland youth participating in in‐school programs (grades 4–12). These NEH funded programs provide critically needed formal and informal learning opportunities for youth and adults that enhance critical thinking and communications skills, foster a love of reading and lifelong learning, and engage friends, neighbors, and strangers in consideration of important historical events and current issues through respectful dialogue.
Note: Ben’s opponent, Tony Campbell, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland
Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger is running for reelection in the areas surrounding Baltimore.
Dutch opposed President Trump’s efforts to cut the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) by 60%. Instead, Dutch worked to increase funding for the HPF.
Dutch says he fully supports the National Historic Preservation Act and its process. To learn more about Dutch’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Congressman C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger
MD-02
Yes, the entire Baltimore region is incredibly rich in history, from the birth place of the Star Spangled Banner at Fort McHenry, to the Chesapeake Historical Trail sites, to the Second District’s own Fort Howard.
Re-examining the Antiquities Act is a serious step that requires real hearings with expert witnesses and nonpartisan debate. I would hope that, if we undertake such legislative reform, we base it on an actual need and not just political whims and fancies. We need to make sure the Executive Branch does not have free reign to shrink designated monuments. Any reform effort should strengthen the hand of state and local stakeholders and allow them to fully participate in the process before any step is taken to alter designated monuments.
I fully support the National Historic Preservation Act and its process. The impact to any historical nature of an area proposed for development should obviously be considered before ground is broken. This should be included in the development timeline – and any developer who wants to build on an historic property understands this.
Yes, they come to my office on Capitol Hill.
As an Appropriator, I champion full funding for all three of these important programs. These funds have a tremendous impact on our district. In fact, a Franklin High School teacher was recently awarded a National Endowment for the Humanities award for teaching local children about the history of our state and community. Additionally, it might interest you to know that I fully support the Historic Preservation Fund, which President Trump proposed cutting by 60 percent. I fought to secure $92 million in the House finding bill as well as an amendment to increase the account by an additional $4.5 million during floor consideration.
Note: Dutch’s opponent, Liz Matory, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Amie Hoeber of Maryland
Amie Hoeber is a national security expert running for Congress in a district that includes Antietam Battlefield and the cities of Hagerstown and Frederick, Maryland.
Amie supports funding for the national endowments. She worries that cuts in federal funding for basic research in science will cause America to lose our technological leadership role.
To learn more about Amie’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Amie Hoeber
Maryland’s Sixth Congressional District
Antietam Battlefield is in my District and it is a key historically significant place. The Monocacy Battlefield is also in the District and likewise is a key location. There are numerous other historically significant locations — some relating to the early colonial years of this great country and some relating to the Civil War.
I think that would be appropriate. I have not reviewed the specific proposals and would want to look at them in detail before making final judgments, but I believe that the views of the people, as reflected in their representatives in Congress, should be taken into account.
‘Considering the effects’ is a very broad statement — it could mean anything. ‘Federal undertakings’ is also a broad designation. I believe that each project needs to be assessed on its individual merits and the positive and negative impacts on a variety of aspects need to be determined before projects can proceed.
No, I have not done so at this time but will, if there is an opportunity, prior to the election, in order to become better educated on the interests of the Historic Preservation community.
There is concern that the reduction in federal funding for the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts in particular will hamper programs in the District that provide a richness of culture throughout the District. As a strong advocate for the arts (my husband and I help support two theaters in Washington, D.C. and are also donors to the National Gallery), I hope that national support for the arts is not reduced very much. The issue of the National Science Foundation is a little different. The federal funding for basic research in science is also falling, and this is of concern both for the advancement of knowledge but also for the maintenance of our technical and economic preeminence. If we do not adequately support cutting edge science, we will lose our technological leadership role.
Note: Amie’s opponent, David Trone, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jamie Raskin of Maryland
Congressman Jamie Raskin is running for reelection in Takoma Park, Maryland.
Jamie says, “In recent months, we have witnessed astonishing attacks by the Trump Administration on the Antiquities Act and the integrity of our national parks and monuments. I believe that we must preserve these historical and natural treasures for the sake of future generations and the enduring character of our nation.” He has spoken out strongly against President Trump’s efforts to shrink Bears Ears National Monument.
To learn more about Jamie’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Jamie Raskin
Md-08
I am proud to represent such a scenic and storied Congressional District, which is comprised of three counties that stretch from the D.C. border to the Pennsylvania border. In northern Maryland, Frederick County is home to the beautiful Catoctin Mountain National Park and the rustic and charming Camp David, where for 70 years U.S. presidents have retreated from Washington’s political and natural heat. Civil War buffs like me love to visit the County’s numerous battlefields, as well as the National Museum of Civil War Medicine in downtown Frederick.
In central Maryland, rustic Carroll County’s rich farmlands have made it a center of productive agriculture for more than 200 years, and many descendants of the County’s early farming families still live here, such as the Shrivers (whose patriarch Sargent Shriver, husband of Eunice Kennedy, was the first director of the Peace Corps). There are dozens of farm houses and lands that are significant historically-registered sites.
As a next-door neighbor of the District of Columbia, Montgomery County is home to many federal agencies and historic sites, including NIH, NOAA, FDA, Glen Echo Park, the Rachel Carson House, the Clara Barton House, Brookside Gardens, stretches of Rock Creek Park and the C&O Canal, and countless other green spaces and renowned landmarks.
In recent months, we have witnessed astonishing attacks by the Trump Administration on the Antiquities Act and the integrity of our national parks and monuments. I believe that we must preserve these historical and natural treasures for the sake of future generations and the enduring character of our nation.
I do not support efforts to amend the Antiquities Act to require congressional approval of national monuments. President Obama created and expanded more national monuments and parks than any previous president, setting a resonant example for environmental stewardship and preservation. In these efforts, he encountered resistance from a GOP Congress, which introduced several bills attempting to amend the Antiquities Act to limit the president’s authority. Those bills did not pass in previous years, but new legislation threatening the Antiquities Act and our federal lands continues to be pushed in the 115th Congress. I will oppose and vote against any legislation that seeks to undermine the protection of existing national parks or the creation of new ones
Additionally, I have spoken out strongly against President Trump’s Executive Order rescinding critical protections for federal lands, including Bears Ears National Monument, and cosponsored H.R. 4518, the Bears Ears National Monument Expansion Act. I have also urged Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to maintain protections for our national parks and monuments and believe that national monuments cannot be abolished without approval from Congress.
As a strong supporter of conserving historic properties and protecting federal land, I understand that rushed attempts to move quickly on development projects can ruin the integrity and aesthetics of those communities and surrounding landscapes. I oppose changes to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) review process that would limit public input, consideration of historic resources, or opportunities for mitigation.
I have cosponsored H.R. 2242, the Keep It in the Ground Act, which prohibits offshore drilling and coal leases on federal lands, and the permanent reauthorization of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which in part, goes towards the creation of new parks. I have also opposed H.J. Res. 46, another anti-environmental bill which would take an important regulation on drilling in national parks back to its language from 30 years ago.
Additionally, I proudly voted against the REINS Act (H.R. 26) and the Regulatory Accountability Act (RAA) (H.R. 5) when they came up for a vote in the House of Representatives last January. Both of these bills would make it more difficult for federal agencies to act expediently to protect our national heritage.
Yes, in my capacity as a State Senator, I worked closely with all of them to advance the goals of historical and environmental preservation. I was honored recently to attend a spellbinding tour and fascinating historical presentation of one of Maryland’s unsung heroes, Reverend Josiah Henson, at Josiah Henson Park earlier this year during Black History Month. During my visit to the Park, which is part of the National Park Service’s Underground Railroad Network to Freedom, I was delighted to meet with Montgomery County archaeologist Cassandra Michaud and historian Shirl Spicer, who were instrumental in developing this site.
In the annual appropriations process, I requested full funding for the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), and the National Science Foundation (NSF). Additionally, I requested full funding for the National Historic Preservation Fund, the HCBU Historic Preservation Fund, and the National Park Service.
I find the fiscal attacks on programs like the NEA, NEH, and NSF to be petty and destructive. While only a tiny portion of federal spending, the money to NEA, NEH, and the NSF is highly effective. These programs were established to inspire creativity and to ensure that all Americans, regardless of geographic, economic, or social status, have access to the arts, humanities, and sciences. The NEA and NEH fund irreplaceable programs and provide countless grants that support education and jobs in communities across the country, including Maryland’s 8th District.
Every dollar of federal funding spent by the NEA is matched by $9 of non-federal spending, which is an incredible economic incentive to fully fund this program. During the appropriations process for Fiscal Year 2019, I supported funding the NEA and the NEH at $155 million each and will continue working closely with my colleagues across the aisle to ensure that these programs get well-deserved funding in future spending measures. I am pleased that H.Amdt. 904, the Grothman amendment to the Interior, Environment and Financial Services appropriations bill for fiscal year 2019, which sought to cut funding to the NEA and NEH by 15 percent, was overwhelmingly defeated by the House of Representatives by a vote of 297 to 114.
As a member of the Congressional Arts Caucus and passionate supporter and consumer of the arts and sciences, I will do everything I can to protect the continued existence and embarrassingly modest funding of these agencies.
Note: Jamie’s opponent, John Walsh, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Neal Dikeman of Texas
Neal Dikeman, an entrepreneur and venture capitalist, is running for the U.S. Senate in Texas.
Neal has worked on restoring historic buildings and has met with a wide range of preservation groups in Texas.
To learn more about Neal’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Neal Dikeman
I am running for US Senate for Texas
I have a degree in history, and have personally restored National Register buildings to Texas Historic Commission, National Park Service, and City of Houston Preservation standards. Though it may be surprising as a Libertarian, I am certainly one of the few candidates anywhere for Federal office with personal understanding and track record of these issues and laws, both local, state, and Federal
I am a strong believer in oversight of the executive branch by the legislative branch
As a Libertarian I am in general in favor of doing only at Federal level what cannot be done at state and local level, and that includes preservation. I have participated first hand in how effective and more community driven local action on preservation can be, compared to Federal.
I have spoken, met and worked numerous times with a wide range of preservation officials and community organizations including Houston Archaeological and Historic Commission, Houston Preservation Office, National Parks Service, Texas Historical Commission, Preservation Houston.
Respondent skipped this question
Note: Neal’s opponents, Rep. Beto O’Rourke and Sen. Ted Cruz, also received surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Phil Kurtz of Texas
Phil Kurtz in running for Congress in the south and western portions of the greater Houston, TX area.
Phil says that federal funds shouldn’t go to preserving historical monuments.
To learn more about Phil’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Phil Kurtz
US House Texas CD9
The Astrodome.
Yes Congress should have to approve the designation of National Monuments.
Could slow down the process
No
I do not think we should depend on Federal funds to preserve our Historical Monuments. They should be funded by preservation societies and private donors.
Note: Phil’s opponent, Rep. Al Green, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Anthony Cristo of Texas
Anthony Cristo is a former Navy soldier now working in education. He finds special meaning in a nearby battlefield where his great, great grandfather fought in the battle of Palmito Ranch, often considered the final battle of the American Civil War.
Anthony has met with the Daughters of the Republic of Texas to discuss a plan to move the cenotaph at the Alamo, a local controversy.
To learn more about Anthony’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Anthony Cristo
Texas-15
Though not in my district, the battle of Palmito Ranch is close by in Brownsville, TX. My great great grandfather, Guadalupe Aguilar, was a member of Benavides’ cavalry during that battle.
I think it’s an excessive waste of time. The locals know the history better than a Congressman or Congresswoman who never been there. It should be left up to locals to accept or deny historical landmarks.
History must be preserved. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.
Daughter’s of the Republic of Texas. They want to stop George P. Bush from moving the cenotaph at the Alamo. The cenotaph erected over the very spot where the bodies of the Alamo fallen were burned after their loss.
Minimally. Texas are a proud group. Anything to save our history will be acted upon by us when the government drops the ball.
Note: Anthony’s opponents in the race, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez and Tim Westley, were also sent surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Ruben Corvalan of Texas
Ruben Corvalan is business owner from San Antonio, TX. He’s running for Congress in a rural district that runs along the U.S.-Mexico border and includes Big Bend National Park.
Ruben says that preserving monuments and important historic places is imperative. However, he believes that the federal government should be the last resource and only get involved when every other local solution fails.
To learn more about Ruben’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Ruben Corvalan
Texas-23
I do not know.
Do not know about this proposal. In general, I believe history is important, and preserving monuments and important historic places is imperative. If private industry or citizen action does not do it, the local government should step in. The federal government should be the last resource to preserve monuments and historic places.
Refer to the above comment. I believe in a small federal government with very restricted powers. The federal government might have a place in the preservation of historic monuments when every other local solution fails.
Never
Federal government should not be impacting our district with respect to preservation of historical monuments.
Note: Ruben’s opponents in the race, Rep. William Hurd and Gina Ortiz Jones, were also sent surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Mike Kolls of Texas
Mike Kolls is running for Congress in Texas, in the suburban area between Dallas and Fort Worth.
Mike believes that only states should have the authority to identify national monuments, without federal influence.
To learn more about Mike’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Mike Kolls
US House, Texas 24
Each household of district 24 citizens and residents. My candidacy is about individual liberty. http://tx24.us
Each sovereign state should have full authority to identify national monuments, with approval/cooperation from impacted towns/cities. Local control, NOT federal dictate, nor federal influence.
Please see answer to question 4.
No, I have not met with any preservation groups.
Individual charity and citizen groups are more effective than any gov’t program. All inefficient gov’t should be eliminated and reunite that money to taxpayers… who can then vote with their wallet.
Note: Mike’s opponents, Rep. Kenny Marchant and Jan McDowell, also received surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Talley Sergent of West Virginia
Talley Sergent, a small business owner in Charleston, is running for Congress in West Virginia’s 2nd district. The district includes Harper’s Ferry National Park, where the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers meet and where John Brown staged his abolitionist uprising.
Talley says that West Virginia can’t afford cuts to programs like the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts. These programs fund the Green Bank telescope and the Contemporary Art Theater Festival in Shepherdstown, and play and important role in the community.
To learn more about Talley’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Talley Sergent
WV-02
Indeed – we have many historically significant places in West Virginia’s Second District. Perhaps the most well-known place is Harper’s Ferry National Park. As the daughter of a high school history teacher, there are many historic places across the state that are important to me, including Homestead School (built by Eleanor Roosevelt) as an example.
I believe that a check and balance is a good thing, especially given the current efforts regarding Bears Ears and many other national monuments.
I believe that this provides the necessary check and balance and provides the opportunity for due diligence. If a project is sound and meets the requirements, then there should be no issue with timelines, etc. It is vital that we preserve our history and pave a path forward that embraces it versus demolishes it.
I have not; I have discussed preservation of historic battlefields in Shepherdstown and have attended events such as the opening of Charles Washington Hall in Charles Town, WV. I would welcome the opportunity.
West Virginia cannot afford cuts to these vital agencies. Whether its Green Bank telescope, the Contemporary Art Theater Festival in Shepherdstown, they all play an important role in our community and support our local economy in real ways. I would support efforts to preserve these agencies.
Note: Talley’s opponent in the race, Rep. Alex Mooney, was sent a survey as well. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Charles Aldrich of Iowa
Charles Aldrich, an industrial engineer, is running for Congress in Iowa’s 4th district, which includes Ames and Sioux City.
Charles says that the National Historic Preservation Act will increase costs and extend timelines. He believes that less federal involvement will mean that local management will be more reactive to community needs.
To learn more about Charles’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Charles Aldrich
Iowa district 4
Not currently.
I agree with the proposal.
This proposal will increase the cost and extend the timeline. The less federal involvement, the more reactive to the needs of communities’ local management will be.
A couple years ago I spent time with a state historian, who pointed out where events of significance happened.
The funding sounds good, but implementation of federal requirements uses a lot of the funding. More local control of projects would produce better outcomes.
Note: Charles’s opponents in the race, Rep. Steve King and J.D. Scholten, were also sent surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: William Timmons of South Carolina
William Timmons is a State Senator, attorney, and entrepreneur, from Greenville, South Carolina. He’s running for Congress in a town where his grandfather helped build the first tall building in town by taking out a life insurance policy to pay for the long-term obligation.
William has also worked with the Greenville Historical Society.
To learn more about William’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
William Timmons
South Carolina-4
The Chamber of Commerce building in downtown Greenville was built as the first tall building in Greenville. It was built by a dozen men who felt Greenville needed to be put on the map and their vision helped shape our community. The achieved this objective by taking our life insurance policies to pay for the long term obligation. My grandfather, William Richardson Timmons, Sr., was one of the men so it has personal significance as well.
I have not spent much time investigating the proposed legislation. I look forward to learning more about it.
I need more information to form an education position.
I am friends with many of the members of the Greenville Historical Society. They have incredible records not available anywhere else. I have worked closely with their current and former directors.
I would love to see whether and/or how much federal funding makes it to SC04. I am unaware of anywhere federal funds would go in my district for these purposes but I would love to learn more.
Note: William’s opponent, Brandon Brown, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: John Briscoe of California
John Briscoe is an entrepreneur and trustee to the Ocean View School District. He’s running for Congress in a district that includes Long Beach, Garden Grove, and Westminster, CA.
John says that the National Historic Preservation Act has led to politically motivated land grabs. He also advocates calling the national endowment programs “Federal Free Money spending.”
To learn more about John’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
John Briscoe
California – 47
Yes. Many locations.
Congress is responsible for “the purse” and to the extent there are purse strings attached to a designation Congressional approval would be appropriate.
The broad implementation of National Historic Preservation heretofore has led to politically motivated land-grabs with scant consideration of the land-grab impact on local residents. Targeted takings that focus on the specific area(s) to be preserved leaving land not directly related to the historic preservation effort would be in order.
No. Always willing and eager to meet with all parties.
National funding for an “Endowment” is an oxymoron on the face of itself. Why would the federal government fund a principal account where only interest is spent (endowment) when the intent of federal spending is “fund & spend” and repeat? Funding an endowment is an odd give away.
~or~ If the spending is to fund and augment endowment expenditures ongoing operations then it should be called what it is: Federal Free Money spending for “…humanities, arts, and science…” where business and residents see no value in funding so the all-wise federal government must step in to augment funding overcoming local priorities.
Everybody always loves free money under any program hubris. But the money is not free. A better approach would be tax incentives to businesses and taxpayers that incent and encourage their funding of “…humanities, arts, and science…” in the fashion they desire.
So There Then.
Note: John’s opponent, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jessica McClure of Nebraska
Jessica McClure is a chemist, lawyer, and a regulatory compliance specialist. She’s running for Congress in eastern Nebraska!
Jessica advocates for science-based policy and supports funding of the national endowments.
To learn more about John’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Jessica McClure
NE-01
Ashfall Fossil Beds is not in my district, but it’s very close. It’s quite an amazing archeological site, containing 12 million year old fossils of articulated skeletons of large mammals, birds, and turtles. The state capitol building is also in my district, and I quite enjoy it.
Considering what the current congress is doing, I’m not sure I want to add an extra layer of difficulty to declaring national monuments. I want our national monuments protected.
The current process seems reasonable, but I’m not familiar with the process in practice – just what I looked up prior to commenting on this question.
I have not, because it hadn’t crossed my mind. At one point during my college career I was an anthropology major and would love to talk to State Historic Preservation Officer and/or State Archaeologist.
Quite a bit. https://www.neh.gov/news/talking-point/nebraska https://news.unl.edu/free-tags/national-science-foundation/ As a scientist, I believe continued funding of these programs is very important to our economy and education in Nebraska.
Note: Jessica’s opponent, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts
Senator Elizabeth Warren is running for reelection in Massachusetts.
For Elizabeth, the textile mills in Lawrence and Lowell are important reminders of how immigrant women organized striking workers to demand fair pay and work hours in 1912.
To learn more about Elizabeth’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. Senator for Massachusetts
In 2012, I celebrated the 100th anniversary of the Bread and Roses Strike, one of the most prolific labor strikes in our country’s history, which took place right here in Lawrence, Massachusetts. The textile mills in Lawrence and Lowell are an important reminder of the role that Massachusetts workers played in advancing labor standards around the country. Workers – especially immigrant workers – stood up and fought back for fair pay and work hours. And women were the true heroes, helping the IWW organize the striking workers and their families.
It is essential that public lands are managed effectively and that we preserve wild spaces for future generations. The Antiquities Act has long preserved this country’s natural wonders, and the current proposals in Congress serve no other purpose than to gut and dismantle it. I will oppose any legislation that weakens the Antiquities Act or undermines the conservation of wild spaces.
Massachusetts is home to some of the oldest structures and cultural landmarks in our country, and I believe it is important to preserve these sites for the education and enjoyment of future generations.
My staff and I have worked closely with local preservation groups to raise awareness of the importance of these issues.
The National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts have helped millions of people to see the world in new ways – including me. As a college student at George Washington University, the world opened up to me. I saw my first Shakespeare play and my first ballet. I am proud to support these organizations and help more people discover the power of the arts and humanities. I also believe in science. As a senator, it’s my job to understand which policies work and which don’t, and the National Science Foundation’s rigorous analysis helps me do this work better. The only agenda of NSF researchers is to get to the truth – regardless of who benefits. Without their work, Congress’ ability to make good decisions would be seriously threatened, which is why I will fight hard to increase federal funding for the NSF and preserve this important institution.
Note: Elizabeth’s opponent, Geoff Diehl, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: John Hugo of Massachusetts
John Hugo, a dispatcher, is running for Congress in a suburban district to the north and west of Boston.
John says that the framers of the Constitution envisioned a weak federal government. He believes that “the power should be in the states to decide.”
To learn more about John’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
John Hugo
Mass 5th Congressional District
Being part of greater Boston and including towns like Arlington and Lexington there is a wealth of historic sites here.
I don’t mind Congressional oversight as they are in charge of the purse strings.
We should do everything we can to preserve our history. The framers of our Constitution envisioned a weak federal government. The power should be in the states to decide.
no
We have an exceptional amount to high tech business – prestigious universities – museums etc. We get a good share of these endowments automatically.
Note: John’s opponent, Katherine Clark, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Paul Walker of Kentucky
Paul Walker, an English professor and father of 3, is running for Congress in western Kentucky. He strongly supports funding of the national endowments.
Paul’s background as a U.S. Forest Service firefighter and as a Grand Canyon river outfitter inform his commitment to environmental justice and responsible stewardship of our public lands.
To learn more about Paul’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Paul Walker
Kentucky CD-01
A few: historic Lowertown Paducah on the banks of the Ohio River; sites marking the Cherokee Trail of Tears in Hopkinsville and Marion; Native American mounds in Wickliffe and Eddyville. Plus, although less personally important, the birthplace of Jefferson Davis in Fairview is historically significant.
I value the national monuments and national parks that have been designated by our past Presidents. Although I believe that Congress should support and assist in designating historical sites as national monuments to our heritage, often members oppose such efforts for a variety of reasons. Requiring Congressional approval will likely reduce the number of designations.
I trust the preservation officers and archaeologists and other experts to consider fully the effects and timelines of historic preservation — and have less trust in some elected officials allowing qualified people in local communities to do the necessary work. Federal undertakings extend the timelines, but the goal is to anticipate any potential issues ahead of time, and to ensure quality development. I would of course support faster development of historic preservation if the quality of project and community impact remain the top priorities.
Not officially, yet.
As a university professor, I know firsthand the extreme importance of the NEH, NEA, and NSF for the continuing research necessary to enhance the district in these essential areas. From the impact of invasive species in our lakes to the preservation of our history and languages to the diversity of regional arts, we must increase the funding for these organizations.
Note: Paul’s opponent, Rep. James Comer, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania
Bob Casey is running for reelection to the U.S. Senate, where he worked to expand Gettysburg National Military Park and secure funding for the Flight 93 Memorial.
Bob says that he values input from preservation experts and enthusiasts alike.
To learn more about Bob’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Senator Bob Casey
U.S. Senate (Pennsylvania)
Pennsylvania is home to countless historically significant landmarks, battlefields, and buildings. From Independence Hall in Philadelphia to Gettysburg to the Flight 93 Memorial, every corner of the Commonwealth holds stories that are central to the American experience. In 2014, I worked to pass legislation that expanded Gettysburg National Military Park by 45 acres, and I worked with Democrats and Republicans to secure funds for the Flight 93 Memorial.
I oppose requiring Congressional approval for designation of national monuments. I believe that we must preserve and cherish our nation’s history by ensuring that areas of historical and natural significance are protected. Recognizing these areas through the designation of national monuments, protects our history and allows future generations to experience America’s natural and cultural treasures.
Congress has an important oversight role to play in ensuring federal agencies are able balance those competing interests in an effective and efficient manner. We must ensure that our rich history, which can be seen throughout Pennsylvania, is protected and preserved for future generations to experience.
I have worked with local preservation groups while crafting my legislation to expand Gettysburg National Military Park. I value input from preservation experts and enthusiasts alike, and will continue working to protect our history.
These organizations play a critical role in expanding the frontiers of human knowledge, enriching our world through the arts, and inspiring the next generation of American artists, scientists, and thinkers.
Note: Bob’s opponent, Rep. Lou Barletta, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania
Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!
Chrissy Houlahan is a business leader, Teach for America teacher, and former member of the U.S. Air Force. She running for Congress in Chester County, Pennsylvania.
Chrissy says that historic spaces “shape who we are, how we live today, and the values and ideas we pass on to future generations.”
To learn more about Chrissy’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Chrissy Houlahan
Pennsylvania 6th
I have been an avid runner for several years now, and one of my favorite places in Southeastern Pennsylvania to go for a run is through the Valley Forge National Historical Park. The combination of its history and natural beauty combine to create the serenity that has helped me at important moments in my life. One of those moments came after the 2016 Election, when I went for a run and tried to process what it would mean for me to run for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Historic spaces are more than just beautiful or interesting tourist attractions. They shape who we are, how we live today, and the values and ideas we pass onto future generations.
While I am generally opposed to efforts to subject historical or environmental designations of our national monuments or other public spaces to political review, I do believe Congress could have a role to play in creating such monuments, as it did in the construction of the national World War II Memorial in our nation’s capital.
As a candidate for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 6th Congressional District, located just a few miles from our nation’s first capital and the site of much of our founding history, I know well the importance of preserving our nation’s historic sites and support reasonable steps being taken to ensure that history is considered as a factor in any decision that could impact our most important historic places.
6a: No 6b: Yes
These programs provide important investment and development opportunities for many of the institutions, researchers, entrepreneurs, artists, students, and countless others that play a vital role in advancing our regional economy and cultural strength, both for ourselves and for future generations.
Note: Chrissy’s opponent, Greg McCauley, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Alexander Howell of Missouri
Alexander Howell is running for Congress in the Kansas City, Missouri area.
Alexander believes that current efforts to alter the Antiquities Act are an “attempt for the current Republican majority to free-up lands that are currently designated as monuments, and an attempt to delay any such lands being declared by a President hereafter.”
To learn more about Alexander’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Alexander Howell
5th District – State of Missouri
There are areas all over the 5th district that have historical structures from churches to old city halls, and even homes built by some of the barons of industry in Kansas City. When I think about the city proper I think about the thoroughfare that is Janssen Place, as well as the Kansas City Museum, Webster House, the Midland, and the entirety of the red brick buildings of the West Bottoms.
This is a difficult question because one of the most famous “positive” cases of this was when Theodore Roosevelt declared several national monuments during recess, in order to protect them against Congressional action. However, the ability for one person to declare a national monument seems to me to be a slippery-slop into other executive powers.
As far as the current acts going through Congress (especially regarding H.R. 3990), I believe that it is a poor try to change the Antiquities Act enacted under Roosevelt, to one that allows the President to shrink the size of National Monuments. What this bill truly is, is an attempt for the current Republican majority to free-up lands that are currently designated as monuments, and an attempt to delay any such lands being declared by a President hereafter. It’s the same kind of partisan bill that continues to infuriate the American populace.
I may be a Libertarian, but I split with the party when discussing national monuments, parks, etc. I believe we have a responsibility to maintain these areas for public use, as a reminder of the great land to which we belong.
I believe it limits the financial feasibility of several projects, due to the red tape the investor has to jump through. However, I do believe that if we are talking about historical preservation, and most especially ones that receive taxpayer dollars to fund that it’s not unreasonable to request that the property be updated/restored according to a set of guidelines that would increase the value of the area to which it is located. I’m not a fan of taxpayer dollars going into an investment of this sort, and would rather see a reduction in taxes to those who perform this work, rather than a “direct” injection of funds.
I have not, but I would love to! In the past my family has looked to renovate buildings with great history behind them, and have always wanted to “bend the ear” of an expert. In my current (sought after) capacity, I would love to meet with them to get ideas, as well as learn how our two worlds could work together in the most positive way possible.
I am not familiar with the intricacies of how these particular endowments and foundations directly effect the city through individual programs, so I will speak generalities regarding my beliefs on federal funding overall.
I would personally love to see a day where contributions made by citizens and businesses made-up all of the funding for these noble causes, rather than it being funding by our current tax system. Meaning that we should reward voluntary contribution of funds in a taxpayer-friendly way, rather than allowing Washington D.C. to determine where monies should be distributed.
That being said, the 5th District should pride itself on being a center of learning and appreciation of the arts and sciences. While I may have a disagreement in policy, I’m happy to admit that I’d rather the 5th district receive funds that allow for investment that benefits our citizens.
Note: Alexander’s opponents, Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver, Jacob Turk, and Maurice Copeland also received surveys. They chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jerry Nadler of New York
Congressman Jerry Nadler is running for reelection in New York City, including Manhattan and Brooklyn.
Jerry says, “It is extremely important that any project that receives Federal funding undergo an analysis on it’s impact to historic properties.”
To learn more about Jerry’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Jerrold Nadler
NY/10
Numerous places. From the Battery to Morningside Heights. From Liberty Island to the Stonewall Inn. I have supported and been involved in numerous historically significant sites and locations in my district.
I do not support any of the changes to the Antiquities Act by the Trump Administration or his supporters in Congress.
It is extremely important that any project that receives Federal funding undergo an analysis on it’s impact to historic properties. And I do not believe it significantly delays any project, but regardless the impact that a project has on historic properties must be considered when developing any project.
Yes, I have been actively involved in numerous projects that require historic preservation coordination. From Moynihan Station, to Battery Maritime Building, Stonewall National Monument, Governors Island National Monument, Ellis and Liberty Island, Morningside Heights Historic District, West End Avenue Historic District. This is just a small list of projects in my district that I have been involved in and supported.
It has an enormous positive impact to my district, and I fully support it’s funding, and believe the Federal government should greatly increase funding to NEA, NEA and the National Science Foundation.
Note: Jerry’s opponent, Naomi Levin, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Manny Santos of Connecticut
Manny Santos, Mayor of Meriden, is running for Congress in northwestern Connecticut.
Manny says that his city has previously demolished older buildings in the name of progress.
To learn more about Manny’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Manny Santos
Connecticut 5th
Frankly, there are so many, I’d be hard pressed to single out one over the other. However, just couple weeks ago, I did visit BELLAMY-FERRIDAY HOUSE AND GARDEN at 9 Main Street, Bethlehem. Built in 1754, it was significant in also aiding with holocaust survivors.
I am in general approval of this. Hopefully, it doesn’t become cumbersome, due to political gridlock or polarization.
One of the dangers is prolonging design or development time for private developers, as it would add costs and make many proposed developments or redevelopments (such as brownstones reuse) cost prohibitive. On the other hand, it is prudent to take steps to preserve our American heritage.
As, mayor of the City of Meriden, I did have the opportunity to meet many local preservation groups. Sadly, my city has demolished many great older structures (in the name of progress). Often, elected officials would rather see new structures built, rather than putting effort into redevelopments of existing older structures.
I am generally not in favor of funding non-essential government enterprises, because there are so many underfunded (perhaps wasteful spending) critical agencies and departments; Department of Transportation comes to mind. It’s a matter of priorities and what level of spending (and taxation) that our taxpayers are willing to shoulder. With the use of carefully crafted laws/regulations, our heritage can be preserved without making it too burdensome for private developers or having to spend precious tax dollars on the above entities, to preserve areas or structures worthy of saving for future generations.
Note: Manny’s opponent, Jahana Hayes, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jason Lewis of Minnesota
Congressman Jason Lewis is running for reelection in the south Twin Cities metro area.
Jason believes that, when growing or expanding infrastructure projects, it is important to restore and utilize historic structures.
To learn more about Jason’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Jason Lewis
Minnesota Second Congressional District
I think we should value our nation’s history, and historical preservation helps us have a better appreciation of our ancestors and those who built our country, and it helps us learn from the mistakes of the past so that we can better our future. Fort Snelling is major site just a stone’s throw my district and its military history dates back to 1819. It is a valuable resource to teach our communities about how trade, soldiers, Native Americans, and travelers shaped our state.
Preserving our nation’s history is extremely important. I also believe that we need to have an open and transparent process when establishing historical preservation sites that take into account the needs of the whole community. That is why it is important to have reasonable checks on executive branch powers, especially when decisions could have huge repercussions for large populations.
As I have mentioned, I understand the importance of respecting local communities and their heritage. Anytime we are looking to grow or expand infrastructure projects or other investments it is also important that we also look to restore and utilize historic structures. We can have a balance of maintaining our history while also improving our communities in a timely and cost effective manner.
Yes, during my time in Congress my office has met with multiple groups and individuals who are interested in preservation and maintaining our country’s heritage.
Minnesota is a hub of innovation and culture, and supporting and maintaining this heritage is important. Key to this is having a vibrant economy so that our communities have the resources they want to invest in culture and the arts.
Note: Jason’s opponent, Angie Craig, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jeannine Lee Lake of Indiana
Jeannine Lake, an editor and publisher, is running for Congress in eastern Indiana.
Jeannine says that investing in the national endowments “strengthens culture in the area and fosters creativity in the community.”
To learn more about Jeannine’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Jeannine Lee Lake
Indiana’s 6th District
In my town of Muncie, the Ball mansions are of significance as is the Gennett building in Richmond, Indiana. These places symbolize and remind us of the strong industries of our past that shaped our towns into what they are today.
I believe that it is best for our country if we continue to adhere to the checks and balances provided by the founding fathers. If presidents need congressional approval to designate national monuments, many will still be designated but with more prior input.
This law may slow development timelines but it protects places of historic significance in those communities for future generations.
I have not had the opportunity to meet with the State Historic Preservation Officer or local preservation groups. I care about the concerns of all my constituents though and would be willing to meet with them in the future.
Yes, I believe it does impact our district. Funding from these foundations strengthens culture in the area and fosters creativity in the community. It has also been shown that investing in the arts and sciences will aid all sectors in those communities and improve the lives of their inhabitants.
Note: Jeannine’s opponent, Greg Pence, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: John Elleson of Illinois
Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!
John Elleson, a pastor and father of 7, is running for Congress in Chicago’s North Side.
John thinks that the National Historic Preservation Act impacts our communities in a positive way, including attracting visitors who want to experience the past in ways that no book or documentary could match.
To learn more about John’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
John Elleson
Illinois’ 9th Congressional District
Yes – there are many. 1. Arlington Heights Historical Museum 2. Veterans Park Sgt Foyteck Memorial (Skokie, IL) 3. Grosse Pointe Lighthouse 4. Leaning Tower of Niles 5. Winnetka Historical Society 6. Evanston Ecology Center
I think it is a very good idea to require Congressional approval of the President’s decisions to designate national monuments. These decisions effect the local people and they should have the most say. Requiring Congressional approval is the best way to keep this power in check.
I think this law impacts our communities in a positive way – it forces the individual states to take on much more responsibility for historic sites in their jurisdictions. I also believe that the Act helps foster heritage tourism, attracting visitors into our local communities who wanted to experience the past in ways that no book or documentary could match (not to mention the positive economic impact).
I have not yet met with our State Historic Preservation officer, but I have met with some local preservation groups. I look forward to diving deeper in this issue as the campaign progresses.
I believe that funding for these groups/foundations has helped and continues to help the quality of life in our cities and towns. Funding for these groups is an investment into our future.
Note: John’s opponent, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Jesse Schmidt of Louisiana
Jesse Schmidt, a small businessman and volunteer firefighter, is running for Congress in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Jesse is a member of the historic society. To learn more about Jesse’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Jesse Schmidt
LA 02
New Orleans and the surrounding area has so many significant historical places it would take far more space than provided to list them all.
Anytime there is an expansion of checks and balances between branches of government, I am for it. This is especially true if it removes absolute power from one person and spreads it to the representatives of the people.
I believe it could stall a federal landmark but there are state and local agencies that can and should move to protect such sites in this event, if it is truly a viable historic site of national importance.
I have not but I am a member of my local historic society.
Respondent skipped this question
Note: Jesse’s opponent, Rep. Cedric Richmond, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Robert Arlett of Delaware
Robert Arlett, owner of a real estate company, is running for Senate in Delaware.
Robert says, “We must preserve our nation’s history, including these historical sites, for future generations to learn where we came from and why.”
To learn more about Robert’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
Robert Arlett
U.S. Senate (Delaware)
Old New Castle, Delaware is an historic town in New Castle County, Delaware. Old New Castle is home to the Court House which was both the county seat and home to the congregation of Pennsylvania’s lower three counties in Delaware that voted unanimously to reject the rule of England three weeks before the signing of the Declaration of Independence on June 15, 1776. Once done this created New Castle as Delaware’s first state capital. This is celebration on the second Saturday each June called “Separation Day”. Next door to the historic New Castle Court House, is Immanuel Episcopal Church on the Green, a church dating to 1703 and it the oldest continual operating Anglican Church in the United States. George Read, a signer of the Declaration of Independence is interred there. The New Castle Court House and adjacent Sheriff’s House are part of the First State National Historic Park.
Congressional oversight over nation monuments is prudent to ensure that our national monuments receive the appropriate funding and maintaining to maintain their historical significance. To do so without Congressional approval would leave many of our national monuments with inadequate care and funding.
This Act puts in place an important review process for every project giving a fair review of potential national historic sites. Again as mentioned in a previous question, preservation of sites of significant importance to our America heritage is vitally important to our nation and the communities they are located in. Sadly, if this Act did not have this review process far too many historic sites would not be properly reviewed by federal agencies for any pending project the federal government undertakes. We must preserve our nation’s history, including these historical sites, for future generations to learn where we came from and why.
Having just won my party nomination on September 6th, we are working to secure a meeting. With the upcoming general election on November 6th, we are unsure if this will be able to be scheduled before then, but will be scheduled as soon as possible.
For Delaware, has received four federal grants in total in the last fiscal year from all three agencies. Delaware is a small state and aside from the large National Science Foundation grant to a university, the remaining monies could be provided by the private sector.
Note: Robert’s opponent, Senator Tom Carper, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Zak Ringelstein of Maine
Zak Ringelstein, a teacher, education activist, and entrepreneur is running for the U.S. Senate in Maine.
Zak says that he’ll be a reliable vote to expand the national endowments and the National Science Foundation.
To learn more about Zak’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Zak Ringelstein
Maine
The Penobscot River is an important part of the Penobscot Nation history, culture, and heritage. Due to historical and modern-day colonization, a recent federal ruling claims the Penobscot Nation does not have rights to the river.
I believe congressional approval should be required to shrink or abolish national monuments, but not to create new ones. We should make it harder for a president to undo important conservation efforts by their predecessors.
It is important that we properly consider the impact on historic properties before moving forward with any project. Once a historic site is changed or demolished, it is lost to us forever, and we should be extremely cautious before agreeing to anything that will irrevocably wipe away a part of our history.
As a senator, my door will always be open to any citizen interested in historic preservation. I studied history in college, and our national heritage has always been a particular interest of mine.
We need to invest more in the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the National Science Foundation, especially here in Maine! I will be a reliable vote in the US Senate to expand all three organizations, and will urge them to have a greater focus on rural America, including Maine.
Note: Zak’s opponent, Senator Angus King, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: Paul Wright of North Carolina
Paul Wright, a judge, is running for Congress in the Charlotte, North Carolina area.
Paul shared an idea about giving much larger tax credits to owners of older homes to create more incentives to people buying historic properties.
To learn more about Paul’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read her answers to our candidate survey below:
Paul Wright
12th of NC
Yes – the old Mecklenburg Courthouse, the old US Mint, and others
Like so many issues I would have to be more informed on this before making a sentsible comment, but if it would slow down the process I would be leary of it
Again I do not know enough about the Preservation Act to make an informed comment, However I am strongly in favor of more preservation. For example I have had such thoughts like this – as a Bill in Congress to give much larger tax credits to owners of properties (houses) built before 1920 on a sliding scale, i.e if they were built before 1900 then say a 50% write off, if before 1860 then say a 70% write off of all expenses and if before 1776 a 90% write off, I think we need more incentives than we have now.
No but I am a fan of their efforts and know a key person who has pushed for preservation in one area of NC
Again I need more information here.
Note: Paul’s opponent, Rep. Alma Adams, also received a survey. She chose not to respond.
Candidate Spotlight: John Briscoe of California
Hear directly from Congressional candidates on the biggest issues in preservation today!
John Briscoe is an entrepreneur and trustee to the Ocean View School District. He’s running for Congress in a district that includes Long Beach, Garden Grove, and Westminster, CA.
John says that the National Historic Preservation Act has led to politically motivated land grabs. He also advocates calling the national endowment programs “Federal Free Money spending.”
To learn more about John’s thoughts on historic preservation issues, read his answers to our candidate survey below:
John Briscoe
California – 47
Yes. Many locations.
Congress is responsible for “the purse” and to the extent there are purse strings attached to a designation Congressional approval would be appropriate.
The broad implementation of National Historic Preservation heretofore has led to politically motivated land-grabs with scant consideration of the land-grab impact on local residents. Targeted takings that focus on the specific area(s) to be preserved leaving land not directly related to the historic preservation effort would be in order.
No. Always willing and eager to meet with all parties.
National funding for an “Endowment” is an oxymoron on the face of itself. Why would the federal government fund a principal account where only interest is spent (endowment) when the intent of federal spending is “fund & spend” and repeat? Funding an endowment is an odd give away.
~or~ If the spending is to fund and augment endowment expenditures ongoing operations then it should be called what it is: Federal Free Money spending for “…humanities, arts, and science…” where business and residents see no value in funding so the all-wise federal government must step in to augment funding overcoming local priorities.
Everybody always loves free money under any program hubris. But the money is not free. A better approach would be tax incentives to businesses and taxpayers that incent and encourage their funding of “…humanities, arts, and science…” in the fashion they desire.
So There Then.
Note: John’s opponent, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, also received a survey. He chose not to respond.
EditDeleteExport